Rethinking historical jurisprudence /
This stimulating book considers the ways in which historical jurisprudence deserves to be rethought, arguing that there is much more to the history of legal thought than the ideas, and ideology, of the nineteenth and early twentieth century jurists, such as Karl von Savigny and Sir Henry Maine.
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Typ dokumentu: | Kniha |
| Jazyk: | Angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Cheltenham :
Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,
2022
|
| Edice: | Rethinking law
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | Elektronická verze přístupná pouze pro studenty a pracovníky MU |
| Příbuzné jednotky: | Tištěná verze::
Rethinking historical jurisprudence |
Obsah:
- Front Matter
- Copyright
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction to historical jurisprudence
- 1. Paradigms and revolutions
- 2. Schemes and paradigm orientations
- 3. Roman legal methods and reasoning (1)
- 4. Roman legal methods and reasoning (2)
- 5. Post-Roman methods and methodologies
- 6. Contemporary methods and methodological issues
- 7. Terminology and the foundations of legal theory
- 8. Taxonomy and theory building
- 9. Private law theory and the resurgence of formalism
- 10. Have there been scientific revolutions in law?
- 11. Is legal knowledge cumulative (or has there been progress in law)? (1)
- 12. Is legal knowledge cumulative (or has there been progress in law)? (2)
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index of names
- Index of subjects.