Private international law : idealism, pragmatism, eclecticism /
Uloženo v:
Hlavní autor: | |
---|---|
Typ dokumentu: | Kniha |
Jazyk: | Angličtina |
Vydáno: |
Leiden :
Brill,
2021
|
Edice: | Hague Academy of International Law Monographs
|
Témata: | |
On-line přístup: | Elektronická verze přístupná pouze pro studenty a pracovníky MU |
Příbuzné jednotky: | Tištěná verze::
Private international law : idealism, pragmatism, eclecticism |
Obsah:
- Intro
- The Hague Academy of International Law: Private International Law Idealism, Pragmatism, Eclecticism
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Table of Contents
- Biographical Note
- Principal Publications
- Abbreviations
- List of PIL Codifications
- List of EU Regulations
- List of International Conventions
- List of Tables and Charts
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Chapter I Historical Foundations
- Section 1. Introduction
- Section 2. From Ancient Greece to Medieval Italy
- Section 3. Early Footings: Bartolus, Statutists, and Unilateralism
- Section 4. Huber's Comity
- Section 5. The Nineteenth Century: The Classical PIL Edifice
- A. Story
- B. Wächter
- C. Savigny and Multilateralism
- D. Other Nineteenth Century Scholars
- Section 6. The Twentieth Century
- A. The Two Halves
- B. Beale and the Traditional American Choice-of-Law System
- 1. Territoriality
- 2. Vested Rights
- 3. The First Conflicts Restatement
- Section 7. Summary: The Classical PIL System
- Section 8. The Recent Codification Movement
- Chapter II. Substantivist Carve-Outs
- Section 1. The Original Substantivist Method
- Section 2. Contemporary Substantivist Carve-Outs
- A. Legislative Substantivism
- 1. Internationally
- 2. Regionally
- 3. Nationally
- B. Non-State, Anational Substantivism
- C. Substantivism in Arbitration
- D. Substantivism in Adjudication
- Section 3. Summary
- Chapter III. The "International" in Private International Law
- Section 1. What's in a Name?
- A. Conflict of Laws
- B. Private International Law
- Section 2. Internationality
- Section 3. International Uniformity
- Section 4. Interstate Uniformity
- Section 5. Conclusions
- Chapter IV. The "Private" in Private International Law
- Section 1. Introduction: Private or Public Law?
- Section 2. Brainerd Currie and State Interests
- A. Introduction.
- B. Do States Have an Interest in Multistate Disputes between Private
- C. Are State Interests Ascertainable?
- D. Re-conceptualizing State Interests
- E. Can an Interest-Based Approach Rationally Resolve Conflicts?
- 1. False Conflicts
- 2. True Conflicts
- 3. No-Interest Cases
- F. Summary
- Section 3. Not "Only in America": Recognition of State Interests Elsewhere
- A. Not for Export
- B. Unilateralist Tools
- C. Multilateral but Non-Neutral Rules
- D. Constitutionalization of PIL
- Section 4. Conclusions
- Chapter V. Unilateralist Encroachments
- Section 1. Introduction
- A. Misplaced Labels
- B. History
- C. The Differences
- Section 2. The Resilience of Unilateralism
- Section 3. Unilateralism in Academic Doctrine
- A. In Europe
- B. In the United States
- Section 4. Not "Only in America": The Ubiquity of Unilateralism
- A. Unilateral Choice-of-Law Rules in PIL Codifications
- 1. Old-Fashioned, General Unilateral Rules
- 2. Unilateral Rules for Tort Conflicts
- 3. Multiple Nationalities
- 4. Capacity
- 5. Marriage
- 6. Divorce
- 7. Adoption
- 8. Maintenance
- 9. Successions
- 10. Formal Validity
- 11. Contracts
- 12. Intellectual Property
- 13. Mea Culpa
- B. Mandatory Rules, or Rules of Immediate Application
- C. Unilateralism in Substantive Statutes
- 1. "Localizing Rules": Concept and Function
- 2. Consumer Contracts
- 3. Insurance contracts
- 4. Employment Contracts
- 5. Franchise, Distributorship, and Commercial Agency Contracts
- 6. Other Contracts
- 7. Antitrust
- Section 5. Symbiosis
- A. Unilateralism is Alive and Kicking
- B. Methodological Implications: From Antagonism to Symbiosis
- C. Unilateralism and Parochialism
- D. The Unilaterality of Multilateralism
- E. Comparison
- F. Combining Multilateralism with Accommodative Unilateralism.
- Chapter VI. The Material Tempering of Conflicts Justice
- Section 1. The Question
- Section 2. The Orthodox Answer: "Conflicts Justice"
- Section 3. The Heretical Answer: "Material Justice"
- A. The Thesis
- B. Relation with Other Approaches
- C. The American Version
- 1. David F. Cavers
- 2. Robert A. Leflar
- a. Leflar's Approach
- b. Judicial Reception
- 3. Other American Authors
- D. European Perspectives
- Section 4. Covert Result Selectivism in the Courts
- Section 5. Overt Result Selectivism in Legislation
- A. Introduction
- B. Result-Selective Choice-of-Law Rules in General
- C. Rules Favoring the Validity of Certain Juridical Acts (favor validitatis)
- 1. Testaments (favor testamenti)
- a. Formal Validity
- b. Substantive Validity
- 2. Other Juridical Acts (favor negotii)
- a. Formal Validity
- b. Capacity
- D. Rules Favoring a Certain Status
- 1. Legitimacy (favor legitimationis)
- 2. Filiation (favor infantis)
- 3. Acknowledgment
- 4. Adoption
- 5. Marriage (favor matrimonii)
- 6. Divorce (favor divortii)
- E. Rules Favoring One Party: Choice of Law by, or for the Benefit of, One Party
- 1. Pre-Dispute Choice by One Party
- 2. Post-dispute Choice by, or for the Benefit of One Party
- a. Cross-Border Torts
- (1) Favor Laesi for All Cross-Border Torts
- (2) Favor Laesi in Products Liability
- (3) Favor Laesi in Other Cross-Border Torts
- (4) Summary
- b. Choice by Owner of Stolen Property
- c. Choice by Unwed Mother
- d. Court Choice for the Benefit of Maintenance Obligees
- e. Court Choice for the Benefit of Children and Other Weak Parties
- 3. Protecting Consumers or Employees from the Consequences of an Adverse Choice-of-Law Clause
- Section 6. Conclusions
- A. Summary
- B. Not "Only in America"
- C. Result Selectivism in Legislation and Adjudication
- D. Exceptional?.
- Chapter VII. The Softening of Concepts and Rules
- Section 1. Introduction
- Section 2. The Virtual Abandonment of Connecting Factors in the United States
- Section 3. Not "Only in America": The Softening of Connecting Factors in Recent Codifications
- A. The Closer or Closest Connection
- 1. The Closest Connection as the Principal Connecting Factor
- 2. The Closest Connection in Specific Roles
- a. The Closest Connection as a Presumption in Contract Conflicts, Subject to a Closer-Connection Escape
- b. The Closest Connection as a Presumption in Tort Conflicts Subject to a Closer-Connection Escape
- c. The Closest Connection as a Connecting Factor in Other Conflicts
- d. Close Connection and Mandatory Rules
- e. The Closest Connection as a Tiebreaker
- f. The Closest Connection as a Pointer in Cases Involving a Federal or Other Plurilegal State
- g. The Closest Connection as a Gap-Filler for Unprovided-For Cases
- B. Other Soft Connecting Factors
- Section 4. Escape Clauses
- A. General Escapes
- B. Specific Escapes
- 1. Escapes Based on the "Closer Connection"
- 2. Escapes Based On Other Factors
- C. Assessment of Escapes
- 1. Too Much Geography, Too Little Principle
- 2. Issue-by-Issue Deployment
- Section 5. The Movement toward Flexibility
- A. The Perennial Tension
- B. The American Overreaction
- C. Corrective Action
- D. A Cautious Evolution
- E. Codification and Flexibility
- Section 6. Conclusions
- Chapter VIII. The Narrowing of Legal Categories
- Section 1. The Classical Model: "Legal Relations"
- Section 2. American Developments
- A. From Broad Categories to Issues
- B. Issue-by-Issue Analysis
- C. Dépeçage
- 1. What Is Dépeçage?
- 2. What Dépeçage Is Not
- 3. In the Abstract, Dépeçage is Neither Good nor Bad
- 4. Occasionally, Dépeçage Is Problematic
- 5. Dépeçage in Practice.
- Section 3. Not "Only in America": Dépeçage in Codified PIL Systems
- Section 4. Dépeçage in the Rome Convention and the Rome Regulations
- A. Rome Convention and Rome I Regulation
- B. Rome II
- Section 5. Dépeçage in Other Modern Codifications
- A. Statutory and Voluntary Dépeçage
- 1. Contracts
- a. Statutory Dépeçage
- b. Voluntary Dépeçage
- 2. Torts
- 3. Marriage
- 4. Matrimonial Property Regimes
- 5. Successions
- 6. Trusts
- B. Judicial Dépeçage
- 1. Preliminary or Incidental Question
- 2. Ordre Public
- 3. Mandatory Rules
- 4. Escape Clauses
- Section 6. Conclusions
- Chapter IX. Party Autonomy
- Section 1. Introduction
- Section 2. The History of Party Autonomy
- A. An Example from Antiquity
- B. The Parties' Implied Intention and the Lex Loci Solutionis
- C. Party Autonomy as an a Priori Rule: Mancini
- D. Legislative Endorsements in the Nineteenth Century
- E. The First Half of the Twentieth Century
- F. The Subsequent Triumph and Contemporary Dominance of Party Autonomy
- Section 3. The Scope of Party Autonomy
- A. Exemptions from Scope
- B. Contractual and Non-Contractual Issues
- C. Substantive vs Procedural Law
- D. Substantive Law vs PIL
- E. State Law vs Non-State Norms
- Section 4. Limitations to Party Autonomy within its Delineated Scope
- A. Determining the Lex Limitativa
- 1. Group 1: Lex Fori (Exclusively)
- 2. Group 2: The Lex Causae (Primarily)
- 3. Group 3: Intermediate Solutions and Combinations
- a. Rome I
- b. Other Systems
- c. The Hague Principles
- B. The Triggering Thresholds and Gradations of Limitations to Party Autonomy
- 1. The Ordre Public of the Lex Fori
- 2. The "Overriding" Mandatory Rules of the Lex Fori
- 3. The Public Policy of the Lex Causae
- 4. The "Simple" Mandatory Rules
- 5. No Threshold
- Section 5. Conclusions.
- Chapter X. The Challenge of the Internet.