Procedure and private international law /
This research review examines leading English language journal articles in the area of private international law. It focuses on a range of procedural issues that have particular salience for international litigation including the location of process and discovery, class actions and the aggregation o...
Uloženo v:
| Další autoři: | |
|---|---|
| Typ dokumentu: | Kniha |
| Jazyk: | Angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Cheltenham :
Edward Elgar Publishing,
2017
|
| Edice: | Private international law ;
4 |
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | Elektronická verze přístupná pouze pro studenty a pracovníky MU |
| Příbuzné jednotky: | Tištěná verze::
Procedure and private international law |
Obsah:
- Recommended readings (Machine generated): Friedrich K. Juenger (1989), 'Forum Shopping, Domestic and International', Tulane Law Review, 63, 553-74
- William L. Reynolds (1992), 'The Proper Forum for a Suit: Transnational Forum Non Conveniens and Counter-Suit Injunctions in the Federal Courts', Texas Law Review, 70, 1663-714
- Allan R. Stein (1985), 'Forum Non Conveniens and the Redundancy of Court-Access Doctrine', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 133, 781-846
- Ronald A. Brand (2002), 'Comparative Forum Non Conveniens and the Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgements', Texas International Law Journal, 37, 467-98
- Ronald A. Brand (2013), 'Challenges to Forum Non Conveniens', New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 45 (4), Summer, 1003-35
- -Dante Figueroa (2005), 'Conflicts of Jurisdiction Between the United States and Latin America in the Context of Forum Non Conveniens Dismissals', University of Miami Inter-American Law Review', 37, 119-70
- James P. George (2002), 'International Parallel Litigation - A Survey of Current Conventions and Model Laws', Texas International Law Journal, 37, 499-540
- Ellen Louise Teitz (2004), 'Both Sides of the Coin: A Decade of Parallel Proceedings and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements in Transnational Litigation', Roger Williams University Law Review, 10 (1), Fall, 1-71
- Jansen N. Calamita (2006), 'Rethinking Comity: Towards a Coherent Treatment of International Parallel Proceedings', University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 27 (3), 601-80
- George A. Bermann (1990), 'The Use of Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Litigation', Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 28, 589-631
- -Arturo J. Aballi, Jnr. (1968), 'Comparative Developments in the Law of the Choice of Forum', New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 1, 178-207
- Hannah L. Buxbaum (2004), 'Forum Selection in International Contract Litigation: The Role of Judicial Discretion', Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 12, 185-210
- Zheng Sophia Tang (2012), 'Effectiveness of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in the Chinese Courts - A Pragmatic Study', International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 61 (2), April, 459-84
- Walter W, Heiser (2011), 'Using Anti-Suit Injunctions to Prevent Interdictory Actions and to Enforce Choice of Court Agreements', Utah Law Review, 3, 855-79
- David Kenny and Rosemary Henniggan (2015), 'Choice-of-Court Agreements, the Italian Torpedo, and the Recast of the Brussels I Regulation', International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 64 (1), January, 197-209
- -Jeffrey Talpis and Nick Krnjevic (2006), 'The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements of June 30, 2005: The Elephant that Gave Birth to a Mouse', Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 13, 1-35
- Arthur R. Miller (1965), 'International Cooperation in Litigation Between the United States and Switzerland: Unilateral Procedural Accommodation in a Test Tube', Minnesota Law Review, 49 (6), 1069-132
- G. Brian Raley (1993), 'A Comparative Analysis: Notice Requirements in Germany, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States', Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 10 (2), 301-34
- Michael O. Eshleman and Judge Stephen A. Wolaver (2010), 'Prego Signor Postino: Using the Mail to Avoid the Hague Service Convention's Central Authority', Oregon Review of International Law, 12 (2), 283-367
- Phillip A. Buhler (2002), 'Transnational Service of Process and Discovery in Federal Court Proceedings: An Overview', Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 27 (1), Winter, 1-42
- David P. Stewart and Anna Conley (2007), 'E-Mail Service on Foreign Defendants: Time for an International Approach?', Georgetown Journal of International Law, 38, Summer, 755-802
- Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. (1998), 'Discovery and the Role of the Judge in Civil Law Jurisdictions', Notre Dame Law Review, 73 (4), 1017-28
- David J. Gerber (1986), 'Extraterritorial Discovery and the Conflict of Procedural Systems: Germany and the United States', American Journal of Comparative Law, 34, January, 745-88
- Stephen N. Subrin (2002), 'Discovery in Global Perspective: Are We Nuts?', DePaul Law Review, 52 (2), Winter, 299-318
- Darrell Prescott and Edwin R. Alley (1988), 'Effective Evidence-Taking Under the Hague Convention', International Lawyer, 22 (4), Winter, 939-88
- -David J. Gerber (1998), 'International Discovery After Aerospatiale: The Quest for an Analytical Framework', American Journal of International Law, 82 (3), January, 521-55
- Hannah L. Buxbaum (2003), 'Assessing Sovereign Interests in Cross-Border Discovery Disputes: Lessons from Aérospatiale', Texas International Law Journal, 38, 87-101
- Kristen A. Knapp (2010), 'Enforcement of U.S. Electronic Discovery Law Against Foreign Companies: Should U.S. Courts Give Effect to the EU Data Protection Directives?', Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business, 10 (1), 111-33
- Okezie Chukwumerije (2005), 'International Judicial Assistance: Revitalizing Section 1782', George Washington International Law Review, 37 (3), 649-85
- Deborah R. Hensler (2009), 'The Globalization of Class Actions: An Overview', ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622 (1), March, 7-29
- -Samuel Issacharoff (1999), 'Group Litigation of Consumer Claims: Lessons from the U.S. Experience', Texas International Law Journal, 34, 135-50
- S.I. Strong (2012), 'Regulatory Litigation in the European Union: Does the U.S. Class Action Have a New Analogue?', Notre Dame Law Review, 88 (2), 899-971
- Rhonda Wasserman (2011), 'Transnational Class Actions and Interjurisdictional Preclusion', Notre Dame Law Review, 86 (1), March, 313-80
- Linda Sandstrom Simard and Jay Tidmarsh (2011), 'Foreign Citizens in Transnational Class Actions', Cornell Law Review, 97, 87-129
- Detlev F. Vagts (1999-2000), 'Professional Responsibility in Transborder Practice: Conflict and Resolution', Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 13 (4), 677-98
- Laurel S. Terry (1993), 'An Introduction to the European Community's Legal Ethics Code Part I: An Analysis of the CCBE Code of Conduct', Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 7 (1), Summer, 1-87
- -Laurel S. Terry (1992-1994), 'An Introduction to the European Community's Legal Ethics Code Part II: Applying the CCBE Code of Conduct', Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 7 (2), Fall, 345-94
- Catherine A. Rogers (2009), 'Lawyers Without Borders', University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 30 (4), Summer, 1035-86
- Richard S. Pike (2006), 'The English Law of Legal Professional Privilege: A Guide for American Attorneys', Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, 4 (1), Fall-Winter, 51-89
- Janine Griffiths-Baker and Nancy J. Moore (2012), 'Regulating Conflicts of Interest in Global Law Firms: Peace in Our Time?', Fordham Law Review, 80 (6), May, 2541-67.